Categories
Call Center

Implementing Remote Agent Stations

By Peter Lyle DeHaan, PhD

For years, starting when the teleservices industry was in its infancy, call center managers have likely wish that their staff could work from remote locations.

Author Peter Lyle DeHaan

The reasons for this vary, from tapping into a different labor market to providing a local presence and gaining greater efficiency by tying together multiple call centers.

As technology advances and becomes less costly, and as more options emerge from telephone carriers and the Internet, it has become possible to have a reliable, remotely located agent station.

The most common use for remote agent stations is connecting multiple locations. Aaron Boatin, vice president of Ambs Message Center, has connected three offices together using dedicated T1 circuits. A Startel 5700, located in Jackson, Mich., handles all call traffic and client information for the three locations. LAN traffic is TCP/IP and sent over one channel of each T1.

Agent audio is compressed using Adtran multiplexers for one location, while the other site uses a separate T1 channel for each station’s audio path. The company’s main office has ten stations, as does one of its satellite offices, with the third location having five positions.

Each location taps into a separate labor market and all agents are cross-trained on all accounts.

Medcom, in Columbus, S.C., also connects three offices. While Ambs Message Center’s three offices are all in the same state, Medcom’s locations are in three different states.

Robbie Parnell, system developer, said Medcom also cross-trains its agents on all accounts. Medcom uses a Telescan Earthnet system for its call processing and a dedicated T1 circuit, with Adtran channel banks, to connect its offices.

“The only problem,” Parnell said, “has been the backhoes” – which have twice cut the fiber optic cable carrying one of his T1 circuits. He advises knowing the path that a dedicated T1 will take and using that as part of the evaluation criteria, as opposed to price alone. He is currently looking for an alternate provider for the problematic T1 circuit.

Michigan Message Center has been using remote agent stations to connect offices together since 1989 and added home-based agents a few years ago. Its primary CTI platform, Amtelco’s Infinity v5.1, lends itself to both home-based agents and remote office installations.

Kurt VanderScheer, vice president of engineering, said, “The technology employed for remote offices was primarily determined by the desire to keep the agent experience at remote offices as close as possible as to that of the host office.”

To attain this goal, offices are interconnected via point-to-point T-1 circuits. Network data is routed as a typical dedicated WAN (wide area network) using Cisco routers.

Agent audio is a dedicated connection that rides on individual channels on the T-1 and terminates directly on the Infinity ACD. Remote maintenance is easily accomplished with VNC (virtual network computing) desktop sharing.

Michigan Message Center’s home-based agents connect to the office network via the Internet over an encrypted VPN (virtual private network) tunnel.

“To be effective, home agents are required to obtain high-speed Internet service meeting minimum bandwidth requirements of 256 Kbps,” VanderScheer said.

For audio, home-based agents use a standard phone line and simply dial into an Infinity account configured for agent audio. For security, VanderScheer requires home-based agents to have their computers protected with anti-virus software and a properly configured firewall.

MedCom Professional Services, Inc. in Levittown, Pa., also uses remote stations to permit agents to work from home. Chris Bell, president of MedCom Professional Services, indicated that remote agents have allowed him to implement “just-in-time” staffing.

Although multiple means are available to connect to the Internet for the data portion of the remote station, MedCom’s vice president, Tom Sheridon, is opposed to dial-up because of speed and reliability problems.

Instead he prefers DSL, which provides good bandwidth, to extend the network to the remote station. Some remote agents connect using cable modems, although they have experienced unacceptable service interruptions.

At the call center they have a fractional T1 with a dedicated IP address and firewall. Network address translations (NAT) use port mapping through the firewall to provide for highly secure connections.

So far Sheridan has used the Internet only for CSR (customer service representative) data screens and for messaging. The voice path is connected via a preprogrammed DID number into the company’s Startel 5700 switch.

He reports that this method has had no significant audio problems. “Even though we could layer in voice over IP (VoIP), standard phone lines are cheap and reliable. When managing remote agents, simple works best,” he concluded.

“One agent,” Sheridon noted, “who relocated 600 miles away, uses an unlimited long distance plan” for her audio connection. He believes these unlimited long-distance plans will become more common in the future, meaning that MedCom will never have to lose an agent to relocation.

MASCO Services Inc., in Boston, has two remote agent stations off its Avaya switch; they were added to support an initiative to reduce traffic in congested Boston. According to Gary DuPont, director of telecommunications, one remote station uses the Teltone Office Link product.

It is a flexible, affordable solution that allows a remote agent to dial up and log into their Avaya ACD. Once logged in, the agent uses a 2500 compatible telephone with 10 to 20 programmable speed dial buttons for ACD access codes.

A call whisper feature on the ACD identifies the call type to the agents. The client database is available via high-speed Internet connection and VPN.  

Their other station uses the Avaya Definity Xtender allowing remote agents to dial up and log into the ACD over standard analog lines, using Avaya proprietary digital ACD telephone sets, which interface with the PC. Again, high-speed Internet access is required and as well as a VPN.

Betsy Petty, owner of Always In Touch in Rapid City, S.D., also employs a home-based agent. In her case, however, it wasn’t to retain an existing agent, but rather for a new hire, who was employed as a home-based worker.

After a few weeks of AccuCall training in the call center, Petty felt that her new hire was ready to begin working at home. The remote station was “very easy to set up, with a little bit of assistance from CadCom,” Petty said, adding, “It only took about 15 minutes.”

Petty also has a remote position in her home, which she uses for administration, programming, monitoring, and answering calls when needed.

She has been using remote agent stations for about a year. In her configuration, the remotes connect to the AccuCall system through the Internet for the data component and use dial-up for the audio. The remote stations are fully functional, including the AccuCall voice logger.

Kevin Bachelder, director of IT for Ansaphone, Inc. in Quincy, Mass., has implemented remote agent technology for his company’s Alston Tascom Evolution system.

Currently, several members of the Ansaphone management team are able to take calls from their homes during unplanned traffic peaks or unexpected call volumes, such as during snowstorms.

Their Tascom digital phone switch allows them to use any outside telephone number as a call taking position and then the end-user connects to a PC in the office using software, such as PC Anywhere, for the data portion of the call. Bachelder is currently doing some internal testing of the Tascom software to get it running well under Citrix, which “is a way of delivering a remote desktop without having to install remote control software or needing a high-end PC on the receiving end.”

Because this kind of “connectivity can be delivered through a Web browser it makes it a very easy and fast way to have an outside agent or agents, because all they need is a phone and a basic PC with decent speed Internet access such as DSL,” Bachelder added.

John Detrich has also used the Citrix server for connecting remote agent stations. His implementation was with an Amtelco Infinity telemessaging system and PI 2000 order-taking system from Professional Teledata.

“An advantage of using Citrix,” Detrich said, “was that if the connection is lost, the agent can log back in within a couple of seconds and continue on the call where it left off.” A disadvantage of Citrix, he said, was the cost of equipment and software.

Detrich mentioned that a second method of provisioning remote agent stations is to use VPN (virtual private networks) and go through a firewall. A clear advantage of VPN is that it is highly reliable.

However, when a VPN connection is lost, all accounts assigned to that agent are then transferred to other agents or sent back into the system queue. Another disadvantage with VPN, Detrich added, “is that it was only rock solid when used with Windows XP.”

At the remote location, Detrich had agents use high-speed connections, such as DSL, cable, or dish. He found DSL to be the most stable; the dish was the second most stable (although only one person used it). The last choice was cable modems; outages of four to six hours were not uncommon.

None of the preceding call centers are using VoIP for agent audio, although several locations are considering it or watching technology developments for future deployments.

(With VoIP, all that is needed is a stable Internet connection at each end; audio signals are sent from one location to the other over the Internet. As such, VoIP eliminates dial-up audio connections and additional phone lines, and has no usage charges.)

Joe Miller, president of Checkpoint Communications Co. in Greenville, N.C., has been successfully using VoIP for more than a year. In his implementation he has two remotely located call centers. At each one, he has a fractional T1 circuit installed and connected to the Internet.

This Internet connection handles not only the data for the stations, but the agent audio as well, along with incoming DID traffic and outgoing calls. Connected to each fractional T1, Miller has a Tenor VoIP MultiPath Switch from Quintum Technologies installed.

At the main call center, data is split out via a standard network port and connected to a hub on his Amtelco Infinity system. Agent audio, incoming DID, and dial-out lines are each connected to their respective ports on Infinity. Corresponding connections are made at the remote office.

The network port is connected to a hub on the local network for the agent stations. The agent audio goes to headset boxes at each station, while the DID and dialout ports are connected to the DID trunks and phone lines provided by the phone company.

Miller tested the service for close to a year before running serious traffic through it. Cable modems and various versions of DSL did not produce the stability and audio quality that he needed. Eventually he migrated to the more reliable but more costly fractional T1.

“VoIP doesn’t require much bandwidth, but it does need to always be there,” he said. He is also quick to stress that when VoIP is being used, all non-call center traffic (such as email and Web access) must be routed through an alternate Internet connection in order to maintain optimum audio quality.

These are the keys to a successful VoIP implementation.

Miller is sold on the quality and reliability of his VoIP service and the Quintum switch behind it. The Quintum switch provides for a dial-up back up in the event that there is a problem with the T1, but his company has used it infrequently.

In his current configuration, Miller runs four remote agent stations and has the capacity to go to eight. The implementation is scalable, so he can go beyond eight by adding more bandwidth and expanding his Quintum units.

When asked about the audio quality, Miller says it is as good as or better than normal phone conversion and that “no one has complained about quality.”

What Miller has built using Infinity and Quintum will be “a big benefit for acquisitions” as a company can retain the staff at the acquired call center, but still obtain economies of scale – regardless of where the call center may be located.

This is “very, very big for tying offices together,” Miller concluded, and may be the wave of the future.

Using the Internet for Remote Agent Stations

For sites considering remote agent capability using the Internet for the station network connection, Tom Sheridon offers the following advice:

  • You should have a static IP address for the call center’s Internet access. Otherwise, your remotes will have difficulty connecting with your system. There are some ways to get around this (that go beyond the scope of this article), but having your own address is the simplest approach.
  • Next, get the technical side working reliably.
  • Automate as much of the connection process as possible.
  • Thoroughly test and then train a couple of key people. (You can even set up a “remote” position in the call center and use it there until you have all of the bugs worked out.)

The goals are to make your remote position work as well as it does in the call center and to guard against unauthorized access to your system. There is no single approach to accomplish these things and it will take some time and effort for you to figure out the best approach for your company.

Read more in Peter’s Sticky Series books: Sticky Leadership and Management, Sticky Sales and Marketing, and Sticky Customer Service featuring his compelling story-driven insights and tips.

Peter Lyle DeHaan, PhD, is the publisher and editor-in-chief of Connections Magazine, covering the call center teleservices industry. Read his latest book, Healthcare Call Center Essentials.

Categories
Call Center

What I Learned on My Summer Vacation

By Peter Lyle DeHaan, PhD

This fall, the thoughts of school age children everywhere are focused on returning to school. Some approach the new school year with dread and trepidation, a few with excitement and high expectation, and others with inevitable acquiescence and acceptance.

Author Peter Lyle DeHaan

Regardless of their personal perspective, many will be faced with the traditional and timeless writing assignment, “What I Did on My Summer Vacation.”

What I did, or more precisely, what my family did on our summer vacation is not noteworthy or unique as far as family vacations go. True, the time together as a family was special and the memories will last forever.

The time of bonding, through both the high points and the not so high points, fostered a deepened understanding of each other and a renewed respect for our individuality and divergent personalities.

My daughter summed it up succinctly, “Ya know, this is kinda like a once-in-a-lifetime thing.”

Family issues aside, it was also a vacation for me. It is one thing to take a vacation from the office; it is another to take one from work. Taking a vacation from the office means you aren’t there physically, but you’re still there mentally.

Taking a vacation from work, on the other hand, means leaving work behind completely. That was my goal; one that I accomplished with a considerable degree of success. Nevertheless, our vacation experience did bring to mind some workplace lessons.

Our vacation was a pull-out-all-the-stops, eight-day adventure at Disney World. The Disney experience and their unique vision for achieving high “customer satisfaction” is legendary and has been the focus of many a discourse.

While true and correct, that was not the central theme of the three insights I gained.

Change Is Not Only Inevitable, It Is Also Necessary and Must Be Ongoing

At each of the parks we visited, we would see signs of change. At Epcot Center one whole attraction was being demolished; at MGM shows present just a few months prior were nowhere to be seen, replaced with newer, fresher alternatives.

The Magic Kingdom had one area boarded up with the simple explanation, “New attraction under development.” Some rides were shut down for “maintenance,” other areas were being expanded, and new developments were being squeezed in where space permitted.

Even Disney, with its reputation as the premier family entertainment company in the world, is continually reinventing itself. If this is necessary for them, then it is all the more true for us.

If you’re not making an ongoing effort to keep your business fresh and moving forward, then the rest of the industry is going to pass you by; don’t get left behind. The moment you assume that you have everything in place will signal the beginning of the end for your business.

Nothing Lasts Forever – No Matter How Good the Idea

Several standard fixtures of the Magic Kingdom had been impacted by the march of time.

The ride 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea was no more; the lagoon still exists, but the attraction has disappeared. The Tiki-Hut was “Under New Management,” and “It’s a Small World” was, well, smaller – the portion of the ride outside of the building had been eliminated.

Even Disney, which has been thus far successful in re-releasing its animated movies every seven years for a new batch of kids, knows that no attraction will draw visitors and hold their interest perpetually. The same is true for us.

No innovation will last forever, no paradigm is without end, and no idea cannot be bettered. Today’s revolutionary, earth-shattering development is nothing more than tomorrow’s status quo.

Staffing Is Key

Despite all of the technology, all of the marketing, and all of the organization and structure, the key to Disney World’s ongoing success resides with its people.

As I watched Disney employees in action, their performances (remember, all Disney employees are “cast members”) were on a higher level than any other organization I’ve encountered.

Certainly they outshone everyone at the airline, which brought us to Orlando, as well as the employees of the shuttle bus company which took us from airport to hotel, but they also outpaced those at other theme parks. How?

Quite simply, they acted as though they enjoyed their work. They appeared to be saying, “I have a choice on how I do my job. I can do what’s minimally required to get by or with little more than an attitude change, I can make my job really enjoyable – for both myself and those around me.”

I assume their training played a big part in this, but I also saw many of them switch jobs frequently and conclude that variety and variation played a key role as well.

These are lessons we can apply directly to our businesses. Yes, we all advocate training, but do we really practice what we preach? Do we give our employees enough training to get by or enough to excel?

Do we do ongoing training, as well as live coaching and silent monitoring? All are required if we are to have employees who outshine the competition.

Then there is variety. True, our rank and file can expect little in the way of significant alternatives in their work as that is the nature of our industry, but even variations on a theme can have refreshing benefits.

To whatever degree your staff functions are divided, spread them out for everyone to enjoy. It may be working awhile as “lead” agent, or “dispatcher,” handling text chat, or processing email.

Even the opportunity to sort mail, make copies, or stuff billing can serve as nice diversion and refreshing alternative. To whatever degree is feasible, give your staff as much variation as possible.

Conclusion

It is highly unlikely that our businesses will ever achieve the status or prominence of Disney. However, we can all aspire to improve our business and take it to the next level.

Rather than be overwhelmed by the formative challenge that the Disney example sets and the enormity of the task before us, we are well advised to start small and put things in proper perspective by recalling the humble words of Walt Disney himself when he stated, “Remember, it all started with a mouse.”

Read more in Peter’s Sticky Series books: Sticky Leadership and Management, Sticky Sales and Marketing, and Sticky Customer Service featuring his compelling story-driven insights and tips.

Peter Lyle DeHaan, PhD, is the publisher and editor-in-chief of Connections Magazine, covering the call center teleservices industry. Read his latest book, Healthcare Call Center Essentials.

Categories
Call Center

Agent Headsets

By Peter Lyle DeHaan, PhD

Headsets were an invention, born out of necessity, to prevent the fatigue and strain caused when agents worked all day on the phone. In order to free both hands for operating equipment, handwriting messages, and filing papers, operators of yesteryear could not hold a telephone handset with one hand, but would pinch the device between an upraised shoulder and sideways tilted head.

Author Peter Lyle DeHaan

Then, when the neck and shoulder became tired and sore, agents would switch the handset to their other side. Various means were used to position the receiver (speaker) near the ear and the transmitter (microphone) in proximity to the mouth, thereby eliminating this need for these contortions.

The results of this effort were the first headsets. Some of the early implementations are laughable and quite heavy in comparison to today’s standards. Nevertheless, the headset was born.

With advances in technology, modern headsets are lightweight and durable. Virtually all feature noise-canceling properties and come in a variety of styles with different options.

A mute switch is a common and handy feature. Volume controls allow users to adjust audio levels to their own liking and preference.

Headsets tend to be a personal thing as well, for which little neutrality of opinion exists. The model that one agent loves, another will hate, though it is often hard to find out precisely why.

The model that one call center finds to be of high quality with low breakage rates, another operation may judge to be substandard and prone to failure. As such, headsets and headset use often become a management challenge.

Today, nearly all call centers require agents to use headsets. In fact, many do not even have a handset at their agent stations. The reasons for this are numerous. Headsets increase productivity, improve agent comfort, and reduce workplace injuries caused by long-term use of telephone handsets.

Many call centers provide a personal headset, at no charge, to each agent upon hire. Other centers require agents to buy their own headset, either one specified and provided by management or one of the employees’ choosing from an approved list.

One option is for the make and model of the amp to be determined as standard for all stations, allowing agents to select from two or three options of compatible headsets, according to their preference.

This provides an option for an interesting economy, since headsets are comprised of two parts. The amplifier can be left at the agent station and be part of the standard equipment at that position, while the “top” portion, or actual headset, is needed for each agent.

This means that only one third to one fourth as many amps need to be purchased as headsets, as three or four agents will generally use the same station over the course of a week.

Typically, the headsets become the responsibility of the agent to which they are assigned or owned. The employee is then responsible for repairs resulting from abuse and misuse, as well as replacement should the unit become lost.

There are many of headset manufacturers from which to choose. Headsets can often be bought directly from the vendor, as well as from a vast array of dealers, resellers, and retailers. Many distributors carry multiple lines, thereby offering greater options and more selections to consider.

When selecting a headset, especially if it will become the standard for your call center, there are several items to consider. Price is the least important of all. First, and foremost, there needs to be buy-in and acceptance from the staff.

If the agents are not supportive of the headset model selected, the amount of grief generated can quickly escalate into a management nightmare. Often, when call centers select a new headset, team leaders and members are asked to test and evaluate various models (or at least the top two or three under consideration).

Sometimes a committee or task force is convened to reach a consensus and make the selection. These steps not only result in a superior selection, but also enhance the likelihood of agent acceptance.

The second criterion is repairability. Regardless of the quality of the headset and amp selected, it will eventually break and require repair. What will be the process and turnaround time for repairs? A third and related issue is warranty and warranty replacement.

Compare warranty time and coverage. Also, determine if an advanced replacement is sent out during the warranty period and whether the defective unit is repaired or replaced.

Fourthly, consider the support that will be provided. Determine what the process will be to address any issues, purchase additional units, and procure consumable items (such as ear pads, mic covers, and tubes) and accessories (such as clips, training adaptors, and in-line mute switches).

When all of this has been accomplished, then price can be considered for alternatives that are deemed comparable. Unfortunately, price is all too often the first criteria that is applied. This can summarily eliminate what may be the better options.

Although saving $10, $20, or even $50 can quickly add up when buying 20, 50, or 100 units, it is often a false economy when the four main criteria are fully considered.

Read more in Peter’s Sticky Series books: Sticky Leadership and Management, Sticky Sales and Marketing, and Sticky Customer Service featuring his compelling story-driven insights and tips.

Peter Lyle DeHaan, PhD, is the publisher and editor-in-chief of Connections Magazine, covering the call center teleservices industry. Read his latest book, Healthcare Call Center Essentials.

Categories
Call Center

A $175 Oil Change

By Peter Lyle DeHaan, PhD

A few years ago I bought a new car. Although it wasn’t my practice to take my cars to their respective dealers for maintenance, a new car changed that habit. After all, there was warranty work to be considered and their coupons for low cost oil changes were enticing. I

Author Peter Lyle DeHaan

t was about the time that my auto servicing behavior was firmly altered that the warranty ran out and the discount oil change incentives stopped. Still, I continued returning to the dealer for service. It was smart marketing on the part of the dealer. Too bad their efforts were thwarted.

It was time for my regular oil change and I had a list of other things that needed attention. Since I am not a mechanic, I try not to tell them what needs to be done, but rather inform them of symptoms.

I want to make sure that I don’t ask for, and pay for, a tune-up when the problem may be a loose vacuum hose. It only took one passive-aggressive mechanic to do exactly what I said, while ignoring the real problem, to drive this point home.

When I dropped off my car, I said, “It is time for an oil change. Also, the car pulls to the right and it starts hard and runs rough.” I left anticipating that they would change the oil, do a front-end alignment, and give the car a tune-up. I estimated the cost would be about $100.

Later, I was somewhat taken aback when I was presented with a $175 bill. As I read the paperwork, my mild surprise changed to anger. Here is what it said:

  1. Change oil: Oil, lube, filter, labor: $24.95
  2. Car pulls to right: Test drove car; recommend front end alignment: $19.95
  3. Hard to start: Instruct driver not to press gas pedal while starting vehicle: $56.00
  4. Runs rough: Perform engine analysis; checks okay; do tune-up in 3,000 miles: $75.00

So, for $175 I had my oil changed and was given some costly advice. Advice to start my car differently, get a front-end alignment, and have a tune-up in a few months.

My complaints weren’t getting me anywhere, so I left – and never returned. Once again, my local mechanic, who I trust to do good work and to be fair, is servicing my cars.

Like call centers, car dealers measure the work their employees do. Mechanics are checked to make sure they are productive throughout the day, that they document and bill for all of their time, and that they complete their work within the “standard” allotment.

Mechanics who meet expectations are given raises and promotions; mechanics who don’t, even when it’s in the customer’s best interest, are given poor reviews and lower raises or let go. I have read that some operations pay their mechanics based on billable work.

Therefore, the more they bill, the more they make. I think I have been to those places, too. At one shop, specializing in unusual foreign cars, it seemed that every bill was always around $500. They weren’t in business long.

Other people also bill by time. Lawyers and accountants come to mind. I have been advised to never use an attorney trying to make partner. In order to get the attention of the other partners he or she will need to log over 2,000 billable hours a year, and their clients will pay the price.

I once saw my attorney across a crowded restaurant. I briefly considered going over to say hello, but quickly decided not to. Our only connection was the work he did for me.

What would we talk about, if not about our commonality? It would be all too easy for him to give some advice in passing, which I feared might result in a bill the next day.

I once called my CPA’s office to discuss converting my IRA to a Roth IRA. I talked with the junior accountant to whom I had been assigned. I told her what I was considering and asked if there were any other tax ramifications that I should know about.

She said there weren’t and suggested she do an analysis for me. “No, that is not necessary.” I replied, “You confirmed what I needed.” “But we just got this new program that I want to try out,” she begged. “Will you let me do an analysis for you?”

Thinking that we were friends and that I was doing her a favor, I consented. The call took less than a minute. A few days later, I received a bill for $100 and a one page spreadsheet telling me that I should switch to a Roth IRA.

The managing partner agreed that the charge was unwarranted – but insisted that I pay it anyway! He promised to “make it up to me later.” As soon as that tax year was over, I found a different tax advisor.

Many years ago, a friend landed a summer job repairing TVs. He was paid 20% of whatever he billed. Needing money and being enterprising, he analyzed the rate chart and quickly determined how he could add $35 to each bill for only a minute and a half of additional work.

He would take the back off of the unit and hit it with a burst of compressed air, charging $8.00 to “clean chassis.” Next, he would squirt the tuner with cleaning spray, charging 10.50 to “lubricate tuner.” Then he would turn on the set.

If the filaments glowed, he would bill $16.50 to “check all vacuum tubes.” With these rudimentarily tasks completed, he would then repair the problem and add to the bill accordingly. He earned a lot of money that summer.

It has been said, “What gets measured, gets done and what gets paid for gets done more.” Consider what you are measuring in your call center and what you are paying for. The intent, no doubt, is to improve the bottom line.

But carefully consider the consequences. In an effort to please you or to maximize their take home pay, are your employees directly or indirectly encouraged to do things that ultimately drive away clients?

If you bill by time and measure agent productivity, do agents intentionally, or at least subconsciously, prolong calls? If you bill by the call and track units of work per hour, do agents assume they need to work faster, setting aside quality?

If your customer service staff invoices clients for the amount of time spent programming accounts, are unnecessary features added? Are the bills padded?

Do they think they need 2,000 hours of billable time a year to get a raise? Alternately, are they passively-aggressive, giving the client exactly what has been requested, even when it won’t work?

Do your commissioned sales reps sell services that aren’t needed or even wanted so that they can meet their quota or earn a bonus? Do you have a “no credits” policy, either stated or implied, that leaves the only recourse to “make it up to them later?”

Lastly, consider billing. One only needs to look at phone company bills for examples of how to do it wrong. First of all, does anyone really understand their phone bill? Can the phone company reps comprehensibly explain it?

Often times they can’t. Consider the countless surcharges and fees that are tacked onto each bill. The amounts change frequently, but coherent explanations are rare.

These ancillary charges are blamed on the FCC, credited to an esoteric law, or attributed to local or state government when the intention was that these would be rolled into normal rates, not separately itemized (like gasoline prices).

On my long distance bill, dividing the total owed by the minutes used, reveals that my 4.5 cents a minute long distance actually costs me 9.7 cents a minute.

It has been said that 85% of all phone bills contain errors. Although we generally accept all of this as a necessary evil, is it any wonder that we mistrust our phone bills and the companies behind them? If there were a real alternative, wouldn’t we all switch?

What message do your bills send? Are your bills easy to understand and read? Can your staff correctly and concisely explain every line item and charge? Are you billing surcharges and blaming it on HIPAA?

What about holiday fees, call logging charges, phone number rental, on-call fees, and so forth? Are you making your clients’ 95 cent a minute service, actually cost them $1.50? Are your clients silently accepting these charges, but ready to jump ship when a real alternative arrives?

Yes, there can be sound business reasons for each task that you track and measure, for every activity that receives extra compensation, and for all the charges on your bills.

Arguments can be made that these practices leave your company stronger and more profitable, but there is also the risk that they push clients away, giving them an excuse to leave when anyone else comes along promising a better way.

Don’t be “penny wise and pound foolish” when it comes to client retention; being truly astute and pragmatic – from the clients’ perspective – will produce the result you want.

Read more in Peter’s Sticky Series books: Sticky Leadership and Management, Sticky Sales and Marketing, and Sticky Customer Service featuring his compelling story-driven insights and tips.

Peter Lyle DeHaan, PhD, is the publisher and editor-in-chief of Connections Magazine, covering the call center teleservices industry. Read his latest book, Healthcare Call Center Essentials.

Categories
Call Center

Outsourcing Options

By Peter Lyle DeHaan, PhD

Most readers of Connections Magazine are outsourcing service providers, offering an array of telephone-related and contact services to their clients. Just as organizations, businesses, and individuals can outsource call processing to telemessaging and teleservice companies, these call centers can in turn outsource certain aspects of their business to other companies.

Author Peter Lyle DeHaan

Though this can take many forms, the main area of call center outsourcing is call processing. This includes call overflow, time-of-day/day-of-week routing, account sharing, and complete 24×7 outsourcing. Some companies, such as Personalized Communications, will also handle customer service and billing functions in addition to providing 24×7 outsourcing services. A favorable exchange rate makes Canada a prime area for cost-effective outsourcing from the United States. Other outsourcers, such as Asian Call Centers International, are offshore and able to offer substantial savings because of lower labor rates. The sidebar “Outsource Call Centers” lists companies that provide various call processing services to other call centers.

There are as many reasons to outsource as there are call centers that do so. Sometimes companies outsource to save labor expense or counter a tight local job market. Companies may also outsource to expand the scope of their services or to pool resources to handle larger accounts. Another practical reason is to allow for expansion without investing in additional equipment or software. Ansaring, in St. Louis, does just that. It found sharing accounts to be an excellent way to grow its business without additional investment. Ansaring is a six-seat telemessaging business owned by Vicki Tarpley. Tarpley said the company has been very successful at sharing accounts: “It takes a six-seat operation and expands it as far as you want to go, with no investment in additional equipment.” She added, “It allows us to handle large campaigns without adding seats. It’s so easy and it makes money for all the partner call centers.”

Tarpley said that thanks to outsourcing, when her company gets a call for a large campaign, it does not have to turn the prospect away. The only stipulation is that calls must come in on a toll-free number. She finds other companies with the same call-processing platform that agree to share the account. Then account set-up information is sent to each partnering call center. Next Ansaring staffers call the toll-free provider and arrange to have the calls routed to each call center. The toll-free provider will funnel the agreed upon number of calls to each partner. The whole process is seamless to the client. “I can’t imagine doing this without my Telescan system,” Tarpley added. “It is so easy. It’s a matter of a few steps and we can expand to 10 times our size, with no additional investment. We can even handle catalog orders with our order entry system.”

Tarpley also shares accounts provided by other telemessaging businesses. She said one bonus of sharing accounts is shared knowledge. When she is sharing an account, she also shares ideas with other businesses. In addition to these benefits – and the additional revenue – she doesn’t need to add staff or equipment.

In account sharing scenarios, it is fairly straightforward to distribute a client’s calls to multiple call centers, but pulling the collected information back from disparate locations or platforms can be more problematic. In these situations, Web-based packages can solve the problem by centralizing all collected information in a single database. One such example is Amtelco’s eCreator. It is a Web-based scripting application, perfectly suited to provide call centers with the ability to outsource call handling on large or complex accounts. eCreator’s Web-based environment gives the originating call center the ability to publish a script on the Internet. This means that there is no set-up required by the partner call centers. They do not even need to have eCreator, just Internet access. In addition, client changes can be made easily, in one place, without the hassle of having to roll out the script to all the outsourced locations every time a change is made. All of the call information is then immediately saved in a single database, making it unnecessary to merge data.

In other situations, specialized software may be required to handle a specific client’s needs. When the client’s usage rates are high or the special software is inexpensive, it is not a problem to purchase ancillary software. However, if the anticipated monthly revenue is low or the software is expensive, the necessary program can be cost-prohibitive. In these cases, the software can be rented instead of purchased. This can be accomplished by paying a monthly fee for the rights to use a hosted software package, which is accessible via the Internet. Several vendors offer hosted versions of their software. This allows many options for the call center, such as avoiding a one-time capital investment, trying it before buying, or building up a base of clients using that software in order to generate enough revenue to eventually buy it. Application service provider (ASP) companies do nothing but provide hosted software to other companies. Sometimes the ASP writes the software, most of the time it buys the software and shares it among several customers. Hosted services will be covered in detail in the July/August issue of Connections Magazine; those who can’t wait should see the Buyers Guide on the Connections website.

Support services can also be outsourced. One example is bill printing and mailing, which is a service provided by Broadfield Imaging. Another is technical and programming assistance, which is often provided by outside firms, as it is difficult for small call centers to develop and afford a full-time technical guru. Most vendors provide phone support for the maintenance and operation of their equipment as part of an annual service contact. Some, such as Amtelco, also provide programming and special application assistance, including custom scripting, reporting, and development. They can create custom scripts with eCreator, as well as custom reports for the scripting application or based on MDR or billing link data. Custom feature development or interface development with another application is also an option. Not only can their services be used in areas where a call center lacks the expertise, but also when there is not sufficient staff to meet a deadline.

Read more in Peter’s Sticky Series books: Sticky Leadership and Management, Sticky Sales and Marketing, and Sticky Customer Service featuring his compelling story-driven insights and tips.

Peter Lyle DeHaan, PhD, is the publisher and editor-in-chief of Connections Magazine, covering the call center teleservices industry. Read his latest book, Healthcare Call Center Essentials.

Categories
Call Center

A Little Help From My Friends

By Peter Lyle DeHaan, PhD

“You need a hobby,” my wife exclaimed in exasperation. I don’t recall the circumstances, but it is safe to assume that I was doing something she deemed a nuisance. Regardless of the cause of her frustration, her impromptu advice gave me pause. Yes, a pastime, a relaxing diversion, would be good, but what should I do?

Author Peter Lyle DeHaan

I briefly considered stamp and coin collecting, both of which I sporadically dabbled in during my youth. But I realized that my interest lay solely in the hope of stumbling onto a valuable find or realizing greatly appreciated value over time. These were not hobbies but investments, investments which demanded time, organization, and planning. They would be more like work – far removed from a relaxing hobby.

I asked myself what I was interested in. What about my proclivity for watching classic movies? But to be a true hobby, I reasoned, it must consist of more than watching timeless films.  It seemed that to reach hobby status, I would need to collect them, or catalog them, or perhaps read about them. This additional effort, however, would serve to diminish my infatuation with ageless cinema.

Next, I considered a passing, yet ongoing attraction to crossword puzzles. Even though I had only rarely picked up a crossword puzzle and was never able to complete one, it did seem like a worthy pursuit, a good complement to my interest in words and my longstanding effort to use them to help, educate, and inspire. Yes, I concluded, crossword puzzles would be my new hobby. I began looking for these word challenges, setting aside time to contemplate and complete them, reasoning that with a consistent effort I would improve. I was wrong. By my own initiative, I had not been able to develop my skills.

The turning point came by chance, on a plane. As I puzzled over the seemingly impossible offering in the airline magazine, I sensed that my seatmate was reading over my shoulder. Finally, no longer able to contain herself, she gently whispered, “You should know 12 down.” I looked at the clue anew and an answer formed in my mind. I shared my suspicion with her and with a pleased smile, she confirmed it to be correct. Immediately, she apologized for intruding, but I assured her that her help was appreciated. Though she attempted to distract herself, a few minutes later she was again captivated by my perplexing puzzle, so I slid the magazine in her direction, allowing us both to see it. She quickly directed my attention to another clue, encouraged me think in a different direction, and then confirmed my uncertain solution. Again, she apologized and again I said it was okay. This pattern repeated itself throughout the flight and soon we had most of the puzzle complete. I learned that she was a retired schoolteacher and that one of her many interests was crossword puzzles. She shared with me tips for discerning a puzzle’s theme and how to tap in to it. She gave advice on deciphering seemingly arcane clues and cutting through the deceit of intentionally misleading references. In the span of an hour, she gave me the direction and education that I needed to improve my skills and increase my enjoyment in my nascent hobby.

Another interest of mine is horticulture, one instilled in me by my parents, but I only gave it passing attention for many years. My home’s landscape once consisted only of green grass and strategically placed trees. Inside the house were one miniature orange tree and a lone aloe plant.  (Aloe is a reoccurring word in many a crossword puzzle.)  To increase the greenery inside and add color outside, I endeavored to tap into this slumbering fascination with plants. Again, guidance was in order and easily found in my parents. They have more insight and experience in this area than anyone else I know. Plus, any additional information can be quickly uncovered in their treasure trove of resource books, which would rival or surpass many a library. Now my yard has an abundance of carefully selected plants and shrubs, designed to add color and beauty throughout the growing season. My indoor collection has also greatly expanded, at times prompting complaints of overflowing its designated areas.

All of us, myself included, need guidance in many endeavors, not just hobbies. When I embarking on my consulting career, many people gave me sage advice. Three people in particular stand out. One was an industry friend who helped me sort through and clarify a transition strategy and first year game plan. Another was an industry consultant who shared years of experiences and warned of common pitfalls. The third was a consultant in a parallel industry who gave expert recommendations for a pricing strategy. Together, these folks shortened my learning curve and paved the way to success.

In similar fashion, when I bought this magazine, the sellers provided a wealth of advice, guidance, and recommendations. Even now, with his formal consulting commitment long past, Steve Michaels continues to generously share his ideas and observations. I also needed assistance from a publishing insider and contracted with an industry guru who quickly got me up to speed on standard practices and procedures for the magazine business. In a previous column, “Going Virtual,” I mentioned that I have outsourced key aspects of Connections Magazine. Though I could lay out and design each issue, it is better left in the capable hands of Dave Margolis, whose design cleverness and creativity far surpasses anything I could offer. Similarly, I could handle advertising sales, but that important task is better suited to the focus, tenacity, and precision of Valerie Port. Additionally, I tap others to proofread articles and catch errors that I overlook.

As with most businesses, I have an attorney to assist with legal matters and a CPA to navigate the maze of accounting and tax issues imposed by the IRS. Like many of you, I even have a computer and technology expert available to guide me through the latest developments with Microsoft, the Internet, and computer hardware.

The point is that I get help from many people. With some, it is a formal, contractual arrangement; with others, it is informal and freewheeling. In all cases, it helps me find a quicker and better path to an end goal or desired result.

All of this is outsourcing in one form or another. In a previous column, I advanced the premise that any aspect of a call center (save the ownership aspect) could be and has been outsourced. I added that for every call center, there was at least one key area that should be outsourced. Indeed, no one can master everything, and no company can excel in all areas. If someone else can do something you can’t, tap into his or her expertise; it is foolish to proceed under your own resolve. Likewise, if someone else can do something better than your company can, form a partnership or outsourcing arrangement. Today, when excellence is expected and demanded, are you better off to do an acceptable job in the house or to do a superb job with the help of others? We can all use a little help from our friends.

Read more in Peter’s Sticky Series books: Sticky Leadership and Management, Sticky Sales and Marketing, and Sticky Customer Service featuring his compelling story-driven insights and tips.

Peter Lyle DeHaan, PhD, is the publisher and editor-in-chief of Connections Magazine, covering the call center teleservices industry. Read his latest book, Healthcare Call Center Essentials.

Categories
Call Center

How Can I Get More Sales?

By Peter Lyle DeHaan, PhD

Almost every day, someone asks me, “How can I get more sales?” In fact, for my clients and prospects, increasing sales is usually a primary concern. Rarely does anyone tell me that their company is making all the sales they want. I wish they would ask me easier questions, like “How can I improve quality,” “How can I increase revenue,” or “How can I reduce turnover?” All of these I have successfully dealt with, but the sales issue is a bit trickier. It seems that people are looking for a quick fix, a simple strategy. It’s as if they are expecting me to say, “Invest X dollars in Y process to produce Z sales.”

Author Peter Lyle DeHaan

But alas, there is no magic secret. If there were – and I knew it – I would start a sales and marketing business. My clients would merely tell me their sales goals for the month and I would fill their order. But it is not that simple. Consider the following list:

  • Direct mail
  • Outbound telemarketing
  • Direct mail followed by a phone call
  • Cold calls
  • Trade shows
  • Networking
  • Referrals
  • Yellow page ads
  • Print media
  • Websites
  • Internet advertising

These tactics have a proven record of producing sales in the teleservices industry. Unfortunately, these same methods have been repeatedly demonstrated to be total failures. Campaigns that have consistently generated high sales numbers for one organization have proven to be colossal flops in others. Therefore, it is not the strategy that is important, but what surrounds that strategy. Here then, is the ultimate – yet elusive – formula for sales success:

Personnel + attitude + execution + management = sales success

Personnel: This is the critical element in the formula. Without the right people in place, nothing else matters. This starts with finding the right person for the job. Over the years, I have hired many sales people. Some worked out, but many didn’t.  (My main problem was that I was reluctant to pay enough to attract the best people.)

What is true for all candidates is even more valid for sales applicants: you see them at their very best during the interview. In fact, even mediocre salespeople know that they must give their best sales performance during the interview. If they can’t convincingly sell themselves to you, how can they possibly sell your service to someone else? To cut through all of this, I have a few key questions I like to ask sales candidates:

How much did you make at your last job?  If they made six figures, but can only expect half that at your firm, they are unlikely to work out. They will be unhappy, develop a negative attitude, and leave as soon as a better paying job comes along. Conversely, if they barely cracked the poverty level at their last job, they may be out of their league to produce at the level you expect. Ideally, their prior compensation should be 5 to 25% less then what you expect them to make with you.

How much would you like to make at this job? The response to this is most telling. Why? Because if it is unreasonably high, they won’t be satisfied working for you. On the other hand, if it is lower then what you are prepared to pay, then they will start coasting once they hit their target compensation. Again, you are looking for a salary expectation that is consistent with what you can deliver, but is still motivating to them.

Would you like to work straight commission? I don’t advocate that anyone be paid straight commission, however this question is designed to throw them off track and see how they respond. To make this work, you can’t ask the question directly, but need to back into it. If they are at all good with sales, they will have already regaled you with their accomplishments, assured you that they will be your best sales person ever, and promised they will produce at a level beyond your wildest expectations. And, if they have moxie, they may even say you’d be foolish not to hire them or suggest your company will fail without them. (Yes, I have been told this – many times.)  Given all of this, they assert that you must pay them top dollar.

At this point, you are in a position to say, “I don’t normally offer this, but based on your track record and past performance, I think you’re worthy of special consideration. I suggest that we consider a compensation plan where you will be highly rewarded for your results and given an open-ended opportunity to exceed your compensation goals.” Then pause, lean forward, and confidentially whisper, “How would you like to work for straight commission?”

First, watch if they can quickly and smoothly react to an unexpected turn of events. Next, you want to see how they retreat from their prior boasting. Often a more realistic picture emerges. Lastly, you will quickly get a true idea of what they expect for base pay and how much they are willing to put on the line in the form of commissions, incentives, or bonuses.

In the event that they are shocked or hurt by this question, simply apologize and indicate that, based on what they were saying, you thought this idea might appeal to them.

Attitude: Having the right sales staff, however, is just the beginning. They also need to have the right attitude. How many times have you seen salespeople talk themselves into a bad month? The thinking goes like this, “Last August was bad. I wonder if August is always bad? I better brace myself for a bad month.” It becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy and they have a bad month.

Or, how many times has a sales person said something like, “I don’t set any appointments for Monday because everyone is always too busy.” Then they add Fridays to the list because prospects are focused on wrapping up their week. The first thing in the morning doesn’t work, nor the end of the day. Before and after lunch is bad, too. I once had a salesman use this logic and he actually concluded that he could only successfully sell on Tuesday and Thursday in the mid-afternoon. It should surprise no one that he sold nothing and his time with the company was a record in brevity.

Another self-defeating attitude is negativity. Consider, for example, the salesperson who says, “Direct mail? That won’t work!” And of course, with that attitude, it won’t. Or how about, “That didn’t work last time and it’s not going to work now!” Lastly, are they willing to try new things? If they are open to new ideas and plans, then they have a much greater chance of success than if they are closed-minded. Strangely, all too many salespeople would rather continue to do what has failed in the past than to try something new.

Execution: Closely linked to attitude is the proper execution. In fact, without the right attitude, successful execution is impossible. I have seen ideal marketing plans flop because of poor or haphazard execution. Conversely, I have seen the most ill-conceived and contrived strategies succeed famously because they were diligently, steadfastly, and consistently implemented. Quite simply, there needs to be a plan. The plan needs to be meticulously followed. And those involved need to be held accountable for their work. This brings up the fourth element:

Management: The glue that holds all this together is management. Good management starts with hiring the right salespeople, giving them excellent training, providing them with appropriate compensation, and motivating them effectively. This must be followed by a sound marketing plan and a supportive environment in which to implement it. Lastly, sales management means investing time, on an ongoing basis, to encourage, observe, teach, and adjust what they do. Put more succinctly, the right management keeps them on task and holds them accountable.

There is nary a salesperson who can be truly successful without attention and oversight. They need to be lifted up when they are down and celebrated when they make a sale, held responsible for their schedule and made liable for their results. This takes considerable time and effort. As such, proper sales management is not just one more hat to wear, but a full-time job. Successfully managing salespeople is hard work. It takes time, perseverance, determination, and dedication. But then don’t all things that are worthwhile?

Read more in Peter’s Sticky Series books: Sticky Leadership and Management, Sticky Sales and Marketing, and Sticky Customer Service featuring his compelling story-driven insights and tips.

Peter Lyle DeHaan, PhD, is the publisher and editor-in-chief of Connections Magazine, covering the call center teleservices industry. Read his latest book, Healthcare Call Center Essentials.

Categories
Call Center

Language Interpretation

By Peter Lyle DeHaan, PhD

As the economy becomes more global and society becomes more ethnically diverse, differences in language become more pronounced. In some areas, where there is a heavy concentration of a particular ethnic group, it is not uncommon for call centers to effectively be bilingual.

Author Peter Lyle DeHaan

In some areas of the United States this is often manifested in a bilingual English/Spanish staff. In Canada, English and French is a typical language combination, but many others also exist.

In some cases this bilingual status comes about unintentionally, because many of those hired speak a second language. In other cases, building a bilingual staff is an intentional strategy.

If a single-language call center has a client needing English and Spanish or English and French, there are many centers to which the second language can be outsourced. But what if a less common language is requested?

What if the client will be receiving calls from peoples of many different tongues? This is when language interpretation services enter the picture.

First, some background: the terms “language interpretation” and “language translation” are often considered synonymous. But by definition, language interpretation applies to the spoken word, while language translation refers to the written word.

When interpreting over the phone, interpreters generally don’t perform a literal word-for-word conversion, but seek to achieve meaning-for-meaning clarity.

As a result, some English concepts requiring only one or two words may need several phrases to be accurately communicated in another language. The opposite is also true. As a result, non-English conversations often take longer.

Although the details are varied, language interpretation services for call centers follow the same general path. When the call center receives call in a language it doesn’t support, its agent calls a toll-free number provided by the language interpretation service.

There may also be a PIN or language code to enter. The call is then routed to an available interpreter for the language requested.  

In many cases, and for common languages, this agent may be working in the call center. In other instances, or for less common languages, the agent will be located elsewhere or available on demand, somewhat lengthening the call set-up time.

Once the interpreter is on the line, the calling agent conferences the calling party into the conversation. With the three parties connected, the interpreter then facilitates communication between the agent and caller.

The agent documents the appropriate information into a message, call, or order form.

The major language interpretation services can handle requests for more than 100 languages. This pales in comparison to the approximately 6,700 spoken languages in the world today.

Fortunately, there’s little chance of receiving a call from someone who speaks one of these more obscure languages.

Interestingly, the vast majority of interpretation requests are for a dozen or so common languages, including Spanish, French, Mandarin, Vietnamese, Russian, Portuguese, Korean, Japanese, Arabic, Albanian, Polish, Cantonese, and Haitian.

Read more in Peter’s Sticky Series books: Sticky Leadership and Management, Sticky Sales and Marketing, and Sticky Customer Service featuring his compelling story-driven insights and tips.

Peter Lyle DeHaan, PhD, is the publisher and editor-in-chief of Connections Magazine, covering the call center teleservices industry. Read his latest book, Healthcare Call Center Essentials.

Categories
Call Center

Reputation, Referrals, and Credentials

By Peter Lyle DeHaan, PhD

About three years ago, I started to sense that it was time for a career change. Work wasn’t fun any more. Many of the things I relished weren’t being pursued at my company or had been delegated to others. My days were filled with tasks that I didn’t enjoy, responsibilities that bored me and a routine that was, well, too routine.

In retrospect, I had tried to develop a call center that excelled at everything, an operation that gave superior service, was supported by the best technology, was growing and expanding, and was generating profits. Although we were not perfect, we were quite good. I had accomplished the major parts of what I set out to do and didn’t have that next challenge beckoning me from the future. Was the rest of my career destined to merely maintain the status quo?

Author Peter Lyle DeHaan

I had always thought it would be exciting and invigorating to be a consultant. There would be great variety as I moved from one project to another, from one client to the next, and I would never be called upon to the keep things the same — change would be my constant companion. Yet I had misgivings. I would forego a stable, steady salary for an inconsistent and unpredictable income. I would be putting my family’s future at risk.

These thoughts continued to play in my mind during a series of doctor’s visits. Unable to find a cause for my complaints, the word “stress” reoccurred in my caretaker’s musings about my situation. Could the cause be my lack of a future vision and the repetitiveness of my routine? Intentionally, I didn’t ask the question that was on my mind, yet I knew that, either literally or figuratively, my job was killing me. It was time for a change.

I shared these concerns with my boss, who was also my partner and mentor. He, too, wanted something different and our individual intentions dovetailed nicely. We set about making a transition. I exited the company, migrating into consulting, and he became more active in the day-to-day operation.

Being your own boss has many advantages. I do most of my work at home (my morning commute is measured in seconds, plus it is a joy for me to see our kids off to school in the morning and to be there when they get home in the afternoon) and I have great flexibility (work can be molded around my family’s schedule). There are also downsides to being a consultant. You have an unpredictable income, you need to travel, and you must continually find new business. These were major concerns for me. I put myself on a conservative quarterly budget to better manage my income and resolved to accept the travel, but the need to sell remained an issue.

How would I go about getting clients? I realized that, just as with a teleservices company, there would be three ways to enhance my standing with prospects and mitigate the arduous task of continual self-promotion. These are reputation, referrals, and personal selling.

Reputation: Having been in the industry for more than 20 years, I was not unknown. I had served on various boards and committees, made presentations at many conventions and meetings (albeit with great trepidation), and written scores of articles. Motivated only by a desire to share with others and be a positive influence on the industry, I had unwittingly made myself known. Providentially, this would be greatly beneficial when I hung out my consulting shingle. To my delight, I found that I didn’t need to sell most prospects on myself or on my abilities. There was only the issue of helping them decide whether to hire a consultant in the first place. More than half of my clients have known me for several years and likely relied on my reputation in making their purchase decision.

For the outsourcing call center and teleservice company, reputation also plays a critical role in obtaining new business. Longevity as an industry provider shortens the sales cycle. When a reputation for quality service, fair dealings, and ethical practices accompany this history, a teleservice organization automatically moves to the top of the list. The converse is true when negative connotations exist. Then your company’s name migrates towards the bottom of the list, frustrating marketing efforts and requiring more time and energy to make the sale. While it takes time and focus to earn a positive reputation, the road to a bad reputation is much shorter and quicker. And once a bad reputation has been established it is incredibly difficult to overcome. Reputation – either good or bad — is a great influencer in closing sales.

Referrals: The second, and perhaps easiest, way to gain new business is when others do the work for you. In some cases you can ask clients if they know of others who could use your services. These leads are generally pre-qualified and often pre-sold. Though this is not an approach I used, some teleservice companies have added many new clients by asking existing clients for referrals. While some elect to reward clients for referrals with monetary or material gifts, others find that a sincere “thank you” garners greater results.

The ultimate level of referrals occurs when clients tell their friends and associates about you, suggesting they use your services. This is a sure sign of a delighted client. Sales via referrals occur when your actions match or surpass your words – you don’t just say what you will do, but you do what you say. These referrals are earned through the provision of quality service and reinforced by honorable business practices.

Credentials: In the last issue of Connections, I shared the story of my lengthy college quest and how it culminated with earning my Ph.D. This degree was intended to be a personal achievement to conclude my education. At first I didn’t talk much about having gotten the degree, but as I thought about the uncomfortable necessity of promoting my consulting business, I realized that I would need to publicize my educational accomplishments. Quite simply, it was a credential that needed to be promoted. As I thought about my other credentials, I compiled a short list:

  • Ph.D. in business administration
  • Certified call center auditor by Purdue University
  • Certified first-class technician from the National Association of Radio and Telecommunications Engineers
  • Second-class FCC license

There were a few others that I considered adding to the list. I thought about my association memberships, but these, along with chamber memberships and social organizations – as important as they may be – are more a label that you buy rather than an acknowledgement that you earn. I also briefly did some name-dropping since I was part of the consultant liaison programs for Blue Pumpkin and Interactive Intelligence. But when I realized that these programs didn’t confirm some level of expertise, I stopped mentioning them.

Credentials are also important for outsource call centers or teleservice companies. Virtually everyone says – and believes – that they provide superior service. So how can you distinguish your organization from the often-inflated claims of your competitors? Quite simply, you need someone else to verify it. A credential is a verifiable recognition from an independent third party that you have achieved a standard level of performance. In the teleservices industry we are fortunate to have three opportunities to earn credentials that can verify the veracity of our claims.

Having just one of these credentials puts your organization in a unique category that few competitors can match. Having two or three moves you to the top of any list.

When I was in the operations side of the industry, I enrolled our company in the ATSI Award of Excellence program the first year it was offered. Initially, I viewed it as a quality report card. It is that, but it is also more. The resulting scores from the Award of Excellence program provide 400 data points that can be analyzed to reveal areas of strength and weakness, as well as areas of consistency and inconsistency. (Here is something to consider: you may be better off being consistently weak in an area than to be inconsistent. At least when you are consistently weak, your clients know what to expect and you deliver it every time!)

It wasn’t until after we earned the Award of Excellence that I realized, even more importantly, that it was a powerful marketing tool and a mark of distinction that needed to be promoted. It is my vision for the industry that when a prospect calls, the first thing they ask will not be “What are your rates?” but rather, “What are your certifications and awards?” When this happens, I hope you will have some credentials to share.

Read more in Peter’s Sticky Series books: Sticky Leadership and Management, Sticky Sales and Marketing, and Sticky Customer Service featuring his compelling story-driven insights and tips.

Peter Lyle DeHaan, PhD, is the publisher and editor-in-chief of Connections Magazine, covering the call center teleservices industry. Read his latest book, Healthcare Call Center Essentials.

Categories
Call Center

The Truth About College

By Peter Lyle DeHaan, PhD

It amuses me to tell people that I went to college for 26 years. Their reactions vary from shock to admiration, from pity to surprise.

Author Peter Lyle DeHaan

As a high school sophomore, I learned that the local community college would admit select high school seniors. Acting partly out of youthful arrogance and partly from moxie, I met with an admissions counselor, hoping to be admitted the following year. The advisor never asked my age or my grade as he mechanically pulled my high school transcript. Apparently mathematically challenged, he struggled to convert my quarterly grades into the semester credits to which he was accustomed. “Well,” he eventually concluded, “it sure looks like you have enough credits.”

I completed my first college class before I started my junior year in high school. I took at least one class a semester for the next two years. College offered a challenge that high school lacked. And though I earned high marks in high school, I excelled in my college courses.

As my senior year in high school wound down, classmates began announcing their college plans. My best friend was headed to a private school to study a new field called computer science. It seemed an interesting and promising choice and I decided to follow her there.

However, despite my parents having sacrificed to make weekly deposits into my college fund since the day I was born, the amount they had accumulated was woefully inadequate. This reality, coupled with the frequent media reports of college graduates being under-employed in entry-level positions, led me to a more practical decision. I enrolled in an electronic technical school, where I could quickly learn practical job skills and enter the work force, for a fraction of the cost. Upon graduation, I grabbed the first job that came along: repairing copy machines.

It quickly became apparent that this was not the job for me. My electronic school credential read, “electronic engineering technician,” and though I fancied myself an engineer, prospective employers more correctly viewed me as a technician. To make the career change I wanted, I needed more education. I reapplied to community college and earned a pre-engineering degree.

I transferred to a local university and enrolled in its electrical engineering program. Well before graduation, a job change took me out of state. I established residency there and resumed my education. During this time, I responded to a help wanted ad. The stated salary was three times what I was currently making. I met every qualification and dashed off my resume, fully expecting to be hired. But I was never even interviewed. I later learned that the company was deluged with applications and it summarily rejected every applicant without a four-year college degree. I resolved to never let that happen again.

Now, cynically convinced that a college degree was little more than an attendance certificate, I sought the shortest path to a four-year degree. I found the perfect solution. It was geared for full-time employees who had at least two years of college. By attending evening classes, in an intense one-year program, I could parlay my various college credits with documented experiential learning into a bachelor’s degree. I didn’t care what the degree was in; I just wanted that piece of paper. As the school year wound down, however, I met with a surprise at work. In my annual review, I was told that my management skills had greatly improved and I was rewarded with a substantial raise. Although I had been striving for an arbitrary credential, I inadvertently ended up improving my job skills. I shared this news with my professor, thanking him profusely. In what I thought was unwarranted humility he dismissed my gratitude. “I don’t deserve any credit,” he said matter-of-factly. “All we did was offer you an opportunity; it was up to you to make something of it. It’s what you have inside that made the difference.” It was years before I would fully comprehend what he said.

Now seeing a direct connection between education and earning power, I returned for a second major. What I had previously learned were “soft” skills (interpersonal communication, group dynamics, human nature, and so forth). Now I needed to complement this with course work in accounting, business law, and strategic planning. This major, business administration, would enhance my job skills, making me a better employee.

After a few years, missing the elixir of education and feeling inadequate as a manager, I began considering a master’s degree. Again, I found a program geared for the non-traditional student. Their offer was compelling, but even more intriguing was that for an additional fee, in advance, I could enroll in a joint masters/doctorate program. And I did. I anticipated that the master’s degree would make me complete as a manager, but I viewed the doctorate more as a personal milestone. My master’s degree was completed as planned and I immediately began working on the doctorate, which I had two years to complete. Already worn down by the intensity of the master’s, I soon regretted committing to the doctoral program. But stubbornness prevailed and I plodded on, meeting the requirements only a few months before the deadline. I was 42; it was 26 years since I had gotten a jumpstart on college at age 16. There were some diversions along the way, job changes, relocations and even a few breaks, but for the majority of that time, I was attending classes – somewhere.

So for me, college has meant many things: a challenge, a means to a job, help with a career change, an attendance certificate, an avenue to a better salary, enhancer of job skills, and management training. College can be many things depending on what you need and what you want to accomplish, but it is not a cure-all.

As a consultant, I do weeklong call center audits. I begin the week with an overview of the client’s company and then drill down to uncover weaknesses and opportunities. In doing so, a distressing pattern has emerged. On about the third day, I often find myself in a follow-up meeting with the person who manages the call center. That person’s common concern is presented in different ways and with various levels of emotion, but it always boils down to the same sentiment: “I feel inadequate as a manager. I think I need a college degree.”

It breaks my heart when I hear this. These are successful, dynamic women, who have started at entry-level positions and through hard work, dedication, and a talent for doing what’s nearly impossible, have risen to significant positions. These are individuals who oversee the majority of their organization’s work force, control about half of the expenses (primarily labor costs), and maintain virtually all of the incoming cash flow, yet they still feel inadequate. They believe that a degree will make everything right. This always catches me by surprise because they conduct their work with such great aplomb, confidence, and success. I am never sure what to say, but next time I will be ready.

I will say, “Yes, college can help you. If you have the opportunity to go and are willing to make the sacrifices of time and money, while putting much of your life on hold, then do it. It will make you a better manager. But it is not a panacea. There will still be times when you will feel overwhelmed or inadequate or unprepared. Most managers have these feelings. But a formal education isn’t everything.

While my educational choices have, in part, enabled me to get to where I am today, I know that had I gone down a different path, the result would be no less meaningful, because as my college professor said, “It’s what you have inside that makes the difference.”

What if you don’t already have a career? These comments about college are strictly for those who have an established career. For the recent high school graduate and those just starting out or without a career path, I always recommend college, provided they can handle the workload. Being a traditional student and going to school full-time allows you to get your degree in the shortest time, but it is not financially possible for everyone. In this case, as for me, you can intersperse education with vocation. Although this approach takes longer, it enhances the experience as your education is magnified by your work and your work is complemented by your education.

What if you have no idea what to study? If this is the case, be sure and pursue marketable job skills (don’t focus on skills that will maximize earning potential, but rather on what will maximize your enjoyment of life – which is not money.)  For those who are analytical thinkers, business and computers are good pursuits; for creative minds, consider marketing or graphic arts. And remember, many college graduates don’t end up working in the field they studied, but rather they use their education as an entry-point to the work force. Once you have successfully proven yourself in full-time employment, work history generally becomes more important than your degree — as long as you have it.

So, go to college, study hard, make the most of the opportunity that you are given, and remember, it’s what’s inside that makes the difference.

Read more in Peter’s Sticky Series books: Sticky Leadership and Management, Sticky Sales and Marketing, and Sticky Customer Service featuring his compelling story-driven insights and tips.

Peter Lyle DeHaan, PhD, is the publisher and editor-in-chief of Connections Magazine, covering the call center teleservices industry. Read his latest book, Healthcare Call Center Essentials.